Wars in the Middle East

Wars in the Middle East The Middle East for a long time has been on the attack on what is construed by other international bodies as malicious and unjustified war. Nonetheless, there are proponents of the war in the Middle East (Halliday 134).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Wars in the Middle East specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In my view, the war in Iraq and Afghanistan has been propagated by personal vendetta and should not be blown out of proportion to mean protecting the world from possible aggression by these Middle East countries. Concisely the war is not justified. Following the guidance of the United Nations, the actions taken against the Middle East should be informed by tangible facts to halt possible actions based on rumors. Answering the following question will help understand the war is unjust, why is Iraq and Afghanistan the focus regarding attacks on terrorism?, are the allegations against the Middle East be substantiated? , is there sinister motive by the Middle East in case they have the weapons? and finally, has there been non-violent way of finding solution to the situation? Answering these questions would actually rest the case that indeed the wars in Middle East is not justified. The extent to which the war in Middle East is unjustified is first observed in conceptualizing the opening remarks of the United Nations charter, it categorically acknowledges the humanitarian crisis that was occasioned by the first and second world wars and assert that it will endeavor to cushion the succeeding generations from the same episodes (Walzer 156). In article 39 of the United Nations charter, the security council of the UN is mandated to use force or non-violent ways in ensuring a lasting solution is reached in any security situation i.e. act of aggression, breach of peace or if threat to peace is envisaged (Tyner 243). In chapter 41 gives the Security Council options of dealing with the situations as stipul ated in chapter 39. It requires the Council to promote non-violent ways of finding solutions, but this is supposed to be rescinded upon if deemed inadequate in restoring peace and tranquility thus necessitating use of force (Walzer 187). These articles of the UN confirm that the war in the Middle East is not warranted in anyway. The cause of the war is suspicion that these countries harbors weapons of mass destruction, unfortunately there is no evidence that provides substantial grounds to believe this. Forget about their intention to use them in causing havoc in the world (Halliday 201).Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Allegations are possible but what follows should be investigation, upon completion of investigation by a reputed and impartial organization, actions should then be based on the findings. Even when the allegations are confirmed, the non-violent m easure should first be given a chance until it fails then the use of force will be justified. This will be in conformity with the United Nation Security Council statutes (Tyner 243). In the case of the Middle East, all these prerequisite steps have been blatantly ignored and military action opted for. This situation in Middle East then contradict UN objective that endeavors to reduce human suffering (Walzer 198). Possession of the alleged weapons is not even a crime provided there is no intent to use them in advancing external attacks in a malicious manner. It does not contradict the principle of self-defense thus constitutes no wrongdoing (Halliday 253). The attack in the Middle East is thus unwarranted and is perpetuated by individuals who want to further their own personal and selfish interest. Singling out Middle East can also be deemed an opportunity to echo fear in other countries which may be hoping to develop these kinds of weapons. Otherwise, the attacks in the Middle East cannot be substantiated beyond malice. Halliday, Fred. The Middle East in International Relations: Power, Politics and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Print. Tyner, James A. The Business of War: Workers, Warriors and Hostages in Occupied Iraq. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2006. Print. Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustration. New York,NY: Basic Books, 2006. Print.

A Place Called Chiapas Video essays

A Place Called Chiapas Video essays This video was a very I opening piece on the situation in the Mexican territory known as Chiapas. I had heard a small amount of things about the problems previous to seeing the video and now realize that I had seen and heard was only the tip of the iceberg. Previously, I had only been told by the media that it was an independence movement by some indigenous peoples of southern Mexico. After watching the Chiapas video I now know the conditions leading to the rebellion in 1994 and how things have progressed since. I admire the makers of the video for not only showing one side of the conflict. In the video I saw the viewpoints of the Zapatista militia, the former ranchland owners, common people, government, and anti-Zapatista militia. This multi-faceted approach is, in my opinion, the most appropriate way to gain a less tainted overall view of any problem. This video really helped me to understand that the Zapatistas are not after complete atounomy, but, are after some self gover nance, more assistance from the government for health and education, and representation in the government. The only thing that I would like to see added to the video are some of the points brought up in class by the presentation given on the subject. One idea is the relation to the problems in Chiapas to the NAFTA agreement between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Also, I would like to see some representation from the United States government on why they choose to ignore the human rights violations performed by the Mexican government but stick their noses in practically everyone elses business. Another issue I would like to see in the video is the support of the Mexican government for the anti-Zapatista militias and their refusal to address the ethnic discrimination involved in this dispute. Overall, the video was strong and I thing that you should continue to use it in the future. If there is ever a video that ...